Prenuptial Agreements – Not Just for the Rich and Famous

By October 15, 2013Articles, Divorce

A Prenuptial Agreement, also known as an antenuptial agreement, is a contract made before marriage to settle in advance the respective rights of one party to receive certain property or “take against the will” in the event of the death of the other. In addition a properly prepared prenuptial agreement may also settle in advance the respective rights and liabilities of the husband and wife to property and maintenance in the event of a divorce. While the enforceability of a prenuptial agreement often gets publicity in divorces of wealthy people, such as Donald Trump, these agreements are no longer the province of the rich and famous.

The prenuptial agreement may be particularly appropriate in the following situations: in advance of a second marriage as a means to protect inheritances for children from a prior marriage; to preclude the nastier aspects of divorce which a person has experienced in a prior marriage; in marriages where each person is beginning a career with potential for accumulating wealth but lacks a current nest egg; and in marriages involving heirs to family businesses and fortunes. Furthermore, business owners, including professionals and members of partnerships and limited liability companies, use these agreements to protect their businesses/practices from spousal claims in divorce or probate proceedings, and also to protect spouses not involved in those businesses from the claims of business creditors.

Protecting the Family Assets
A “simple” prenuptial agreement which may be significant for a younger family member is one that protects only the family business or other family assets by confirming that any interest in the business or other family assets received by that family member by gift or inheritance, as well as any income from or growth of those assets, will remain family assets, free from claims of the spouse.

Prompted by high divorce rates and the phenomena of serial marriages and dual-income families, couples seek a practical way to deal with their property and incomes in advance of a possible divorce. The divorce process, which becomes laden with emotion, often makes objective and reasoned decisions impossible. In addition, the perceived high cost of protracted divorce litigation creates an air of pragmatism when it comes to the bonds of matrimony.

A Desire for Financial Order — Not a Lack of Trust
Notwithstanding the utility of a prenuptial agreement, a party’s request for such an agreement will often result in an emotional response and controversy because the agreement contemplates the failure of the relationship before it begins. However, if the requesting party can convey that it is not a lack of love or trust that motivates the request, but a desire for financial order and continuity that will benefit both parties, a prenuptial agreement can, in fact, add to the solidarity of a marriage.

Although property distribution laws in the event of divorce and death vary from state to state, generally, a valid prenuptial agreement will allow a couple to avoid state laws governing property division in such circumstances. For example, equitable distribution states like Missouri do not require an equal division of marital property, and allow certain exemptions for separate (non-marital) property, such as property owned before the marriage or property acquired during the marriage by gift or inheritance (so long as that property has not been commingled with marital property). However, because of ever changing judicial interpretations and applications of the laws controlling property issues in divorce, many legal principles have developed which permit a court to “transmute” separate property into marital property, even if the title to such property remains in the sole name of one party. As a result, a party may be successful in claiming a marital interest in premarital, gifted and inherited property, including real estate, bank accounts, publicly traded and closely held stocks, pensions and other retirement funds and business interests. A well drafted premarital agreement can block such a claim.

Frequently, divorce and probate litigation may involve a family business. Issues often arise as to whether the increase in value of a business interest is property subject to division, even if the business interest was acquired before the marriage or after the marriage by gift or inheritance. This is why knowledgeable family business owners often insist that their children invoke the protection of a prenuptial agreement. Although it is unclear whether such an agreement can insulate the financial affairs of a family business from the invasive discovery process that accompanies a domestic proceeding, a prenuptial agreement can help prevent the disruption of a business if a divorce or death occurs.

Prenuptial Agreement — A Preventative Measure
Nevertheless, a prenuptial agreement cannot be viewed as an insurance policy against subsequent litigation or successful claims against property and income. Rather, it should be viewed as a preventative measure. A spouse who is eager to marry may enter into a contract that becomes less palatable over time, as circumstances change, the marriage sours or a wealthy spouse dies. As a result, challenges to the validity of prenuptial agreements are becoming fairly commonplace.

Missouri has not enacted laws governing the validity of prenuptial agreements. However, Missouri courts have developed some standards for determining the validity and enforceability of these agreements. If an agreement is entered into freely, fairly, knowingly, with understanding, in good faith and with full financial disclosure, it will be upheld by the court so long as it is also determined to be conscionable. As a result, the courts have the discretion to invalidate a prenuptial agreement.

Allow Ample Time for Review and Signing
While counsel cannot give an iron-clad guarantee that a prenuptial agreement will withstand a future challenge, such agreements serve a useful purpose and are frequently upheld by the courts. Furthermore, persons entering into a prenuptial agreement can take certain practical steps to increase the likelihood that a prenuptial agreement will be enforced. First, the parties should allow ample time in advance of the wedding to finalize the details of the agreement; the longer the time between the signing and the wedding, the better. Also, each party must make full financial disclosure, and should obtain the advice of independent counsel specializing in matrimonial law. Further, memorializing the signing of the agreement through videotape or court stenographer will help defend against later claims of fraud, duress, coercion, or a lack of understanding of the terms. Finally, to avoid a breach of contract claim, a spouse doing estate planning after the agreement is signed should make sure that the terms of the estate planning documents comply with the provisions of the prenuptial agreement.

Whether to use a prenuptial agreement is a personal decision. Marriage today is an economic as well as an emotional partnership. The cost of a prenuptial agreement depends on the nature, amount and complexity of the assets involved, as well as the extent of the negotiation and drafting process. The cost, which can include the fees of attorneys, accountants and qualified appraisers, may be anywhere from $1,000 to many thousands of dollars. But a properly drafted agreement is worth every penny. It will prevent a protracted divorce that culminates in an unanticipated award of maintenance or an unfair division of valuable family and personal assets, or both.

By: Bruce Friedman

Bruce E. Friedman

Bruce E. Friedman

With over 30 years of practice, St. Louis family law attorney Bruce E. Friedman has provided guidance in complex financial issues including high net worth individuals, business valuations, and maintenance. Additionally, Mr. Friedman provides other services such as prenuptial and postnuptial agreements and domestic partnership agreements.
Bruce E. Friedman

Latest posts by Bruce E. Friedman (see all)

Leave a Reply